
Not so much a review...,
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
...more a counter to those who have attacked Jackson for daring to cut bits of the book out.
My argument is simple: I want you all to compare Fellowship (the book) with the 1st Harry Potter. Now, the Harry Potter movie used a virtually word for word translation from page to screen, and that made for two and a half hour movie. Fellowship is longer, denser and more richly plotted and populated, so if Jackson had used all of the book, it would have been five hours long and lost a considerable amount of necessary pace. As it is, at 3 hours, you don't notice the running time, and I'm willing to be the extended version is the same. It needed cutting, stuff like the songs and Tom Bombadil drag the story in the book and people would have walked out of the movie if they had been in the script. Can you see what I'm getting at?
Now, the movie. It's great, I've read LOTR about 4-5 times in my life, it's a book I can always lose myself in, an amazing piece of escapism, but it's not perfect, the lack of women characters is noticeable, especially in such a sensitive race as the Elves. Jackson does his best to counter this by increasing the role of Arwen, and Liv Tyler does well in the role.
What is in the movie is pretty much universally well done. LOTR:Fellowship is that rarest of things, a blockbuster movie done with an obvious love for the subject material. The scenery is perfect, and the effects are an impressive use of great make up and digital imagery. The Black Riders in particular are very creepy and not a little scary. The central characters are cast to a tee. Most impressive are Elijah Wood as the scared, uncertain, but steely Frodo, Viggo Mortensen broods well as Aragorn, and is pretty good with that sword of his. I have to mention the great Christopher Lee as the corrupted wizard Saruman, in what screen time he has, a lasting impression is made, but it is his old friend turned adversary that really turns heads. Ian McKellen's Gandalf is perfect, a grumbling, affectionate, seemingly harmless old wizard hiding the powerful and wise warrior who confronts the demon in Moria. He makes the movie what it is, or at least contributes greatly to it.
The bottom line is, in a time of souless flashy blockbusters more interested in what they can create with CGI than the script, the actors or the audience, Peter Jackson has me and most of the world salivating in anticipation of The Two Towers, and that can only be a good thing. Roll on December (my Preciousss...)
Review ID: 10000000005132347

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.