
American Psycho

I was initially attracted to this social satire for two reasons: firstly, I had bought the novel and, on seeing it at the bottom of a pile of about twenty books that I have bought and am yet to read, I thought I would cut corners and watch the DVD first. The second reason that I was attracted to this film is because I enjoyed "Rules of Attraction" immensely, and on finding out the character of Sean Bateman is supposed to be Patrick Bateman's nephew, I wanted to see where evil was born.
Briefly, "Patrick Bateman is handsome, well-educated and intelligent. He is twenty-six and living his own American dream. He works by day on Wall Street, earning a fortune to compliment the one he was born with. At night he descends into madness, as he experiments with fear and violence".
By all accounts and purposes, "American Psycho" is a "hit and miss" film. On the one hand, you have the amazing set, a high quality of acting and a great soundtrack; on the other hand you have a one-dimensional leading character and a poor finale to the film. For those of you who have seen "American Beauty" or the "Truman Show", the amazing contrast of colours and product placement will seem mouth-wateringly familiar. There is an obsessive attention to detail throughout the course of the film, and given Bateman's minimalistic but attractive apartment, it is easy to see why '80's materialism flourished so profoundly. I must also praise Witherspoon's acting in this piece - she captures the detachment and estrangement personified by the newly-found independent women of the 1980's so well that it comes as no surprise that her character does not either notice her "partner's" odd behviour or seem particularly put-out when he ends their relationship. For those of you (like me) who are too young to really remember the music of the 80's, but who have been introduced to the era via "Grand Theft Auto: Vice City", you will love this soundtrack...get ready to tap your feet and long to be ten (five?) years older.
What lets the film down, however, is the character of Bateman himself and the poor finale to the storyline. Before I criticise the character, I want to make two points clear: firstly, I am not criticising Christian Bale as an actor - I think when you see the contrast between this and "The Machinist", you will see what a talented man he is; clearly capable of turning his hand at any role. Secondly, I realise that the character of Patrick Bateman is supposed to be horrendously shallow - encapsulating the spirit of Wall Street at the time. After an hour of watching the film, however, the controlling nature of Bateman, coupled with his lack of subtance, identity or history, becomes remarkably tiresome and your mind starts to wander somewhat. For those of you who like clarity in the final scene, avoid this film as the credits seem to begin with a huge question mark over the climax of the film. We are led to believe (and some reviewers here have concluded) that Bateman didn't really kill any of his victims - their deaths were a figment of his imagination. In that case then, where does the police detective investigating the disapperance of Paul Allen (Bateman's second on-screen murder) come in? And if he is supposed to be a ghost pricking Bateman's conscience, how is it that Jean (his secretary) can see him?
Look out for a lack of remorse (carthasis) at the end of the film: Bateman never gives any real reason as to "why" he murders people, because in truth, he doesn'
Review ID: 10000000003927557

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.