This is the sequel of the movie "28 days later" which takes as 6 months after the first one. All the infected have died of starvation and London is beginning to repopulate. Again something goes wrong and everybody is running for their lives. This is pretty much the synopsis of the movie. The scenery (central London) is nice and special effects are ok also. The movie has nothing more to show you than the first one and it is not a movie that you are going to remember for more than a week. If you like gore, blood and splatter then this movie is for you. If you want a plot, some descent acting and a good script then see something else. Surely not a movie to buy but a movie to rent when you are with your friends. The most annoying thing was the camera shots which is like an infected has the camera on his hands when he is running.
I watched "28 weeks later" last night and I is brilliant. It certainly makes you think, could it ever happen. Why not , my answer. With all the chemical warfare that is talked about in the news lately, I certainly wonder. It had me on the edge of my chair almost all the way through the film, I nearly jumped out of it at one point. Robert Carlisle is excellent in the film, I man of many faces definitely but in this film I think he was at his most frightening. "28 weeks later as well as 28 days later are two of my favourite films, ones that I would watch again and again, and can't wait for the next film.